Loyola Study Provides In-Depth Look at How Patients Experience Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
Several companies sell genetic testing directly to consumers, but little research has been done on how consumers experience such tests. The tests have raised questions about the validity and accuracy of the information provided to consumers – especially without the involvement of a qualified health care professional.
Now, a study lead by a Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine researcher, along with colleagues including Nancy S. Hogan, PhD, RN, a distinguished professor in Loyola’s Marcella Niehoff School of Nursing, is providing insight into how a diverse sample of primary care patients experience genetic testing.
Lead researcher Katherine Wasson, PhD, MPH, and colleagues are conducted in-depth interviews with 20 patients recruited from primary care clinics. Among the findings, published online ahead of print in the Journal of Community Genetics:
- Most participants thought results were fairly easy to understand – with the help of a genetic counselor (provided by the study, not the testing company). But fewer than half said they might be able to understand results on their own.
- Most participants expressed no concern or hesitation about testing. But a few worried about confidentiality – especially whether results could affect their health insurance coverage. A few also expressed fears about getting bad results. As one participant explained, “I mean, you want to know, but then you don’t want to know.”
- Participants gave several reasons why they decided to undergo testing. Most simply said they were curious. “I don’t have a scientific background, so a lot of it is just fascinating to see how all of that can spin out,” one participant said. Many also said test results would provide knowledge they could act on, and help them prepare for the future. Said one: “If you know that there’s something going on you can go ahead and fix it now and not have to try to fix it later when it’s already unfixable.” A few participants wanted to help their families or the next generation, or more broadly, contribute to research and medical science.
- Most participants were pleased with results of the tests, mainly because they had not received bad news, despite the uncertainty of the results. “This makes me feel great,” said one such participant. “I know I’ll be around at least another year or two.”
- About half the participants said they had made no changes in response to results, mainly because there was nothing on which to act. But among a few participants, receiving “low-risk” results was a motivating factor to improve their health behavior, mainly through more exercise and a better diet.
- One year after testing, most participants said they would take the test again, and recommend it to others. “It’s as if you stepped into a time capsule and you went ahead in time and you can see something,” one participant said.
Patients were interviewed individually four times: during an initial session in which a saliva sample was given; 4 to 6 weeks later, when they received results; 3 months after receiving results; and 12 months after receiving results. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.
The patients ranged in age from 29 to 63; the average age was 49.5. Sixty percent were female, 50 percent were white and 50 percent were African American. Thirty percent were high school graduates, 40 percent had some college, 25 percent were college graduates and 5 percent were postgraduates.
Researchers concluded: “This longitudinal, qualitative study adds more in-depth information to the emerging data on participants’ decision-making process about, experience of, and reactions to direct-to-consumer testing over time. …It is possible that our findings could be relevant to more general consumers with similar demographics, though further investigation is needed.”
Companies such as 23andMe and Navigenics test consumers’ genomes for single-gene disorders such as cystic fibrosis; for risks of developing complex disorders involving multiple genes, such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes; for sensitivities to drugs such as Coumadin; and for traits such as hair color, eye color, and baldness. Costs range from roughly $100 to $1,500. Consumers can order these tests directly and receive results without the involvement of a qualified health-care professional, such as a geneticist or genetic counselor.
Wasson, first author of the study, is an assistant professor in the Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics in Loyola’s Stritch School of Medicine. Other authors are Tonya Nashay Sanders, MA, PhD, an assistant professor at Morgan State University in Baltimore; Nancy S. Hogan, PhD, RN, a distinguished professor in Loyola’s Marcella Niehoff School of Nursing; Sara Cherny, MS, CGC, of Cadence Health and Kathy J. Helzisouer, MD, MHS, of Mercy Medical Center in Baltimore.
More Featured Stories
Coming upThe RACE exhibition, which opens October 12 and runs through January 25 in Skokie, offers our University community the opportunity to delve more deeply into one of the key issues related to our social justice mission.
CommunicationWorkers. Manual laborers. People who take on hard jobs with long hours. A new book from Loyola’s School of Communication students, “Working In Chicago,” tells their stories.
ResearchLoyola psychology professor Grayson Holmbeck has been studying children with spina bifida for more than 20 years. In that time, he says: “We’ve learned a lot about what their problems and issues are, what we can do to help them, and more importantly, what they’re capable of.”
QuinlanOn Monday, October 6, Loyola hosted its third annual Quinlan Case Competition. In all, 49 undergraduate business students teamed up to put their problem-solving skills to the test.
HistoryNestled just south of Midway Airport, Chrysler Village is a neighborhood with a unique past. Six of Loyola’s public history graduate students recently researched the area and wrote a nomination to get it listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
What’s next?In today’s economy, recent college graduates face fierce competition for jobs. These three members of the Class of 2014, however, were able to stand out from the crowd and find full-time jobs.
Professor profileQuinlan Professor Nenad Jukić was named Loyola’s Faculty Member of the Year on September 14 as part of the University’s Faculty Convocation. This latest award caps off a string of impressive accolades for Jukić, who also was named Quinlan’s Outstanding Undergraduate Teacher of the Year.
Helping othersFour Loyola graduate students were recently selected for the prestigious Albert Schweitzer Fellowship program and will spend the next year working on healthcare-related projects to help underserved communities in Chicago.
VideosThe service of faith and the promotion of justice is the mission of the Society of Jesus. Our 2014 Founders’ Dinner awards recipients are among the best and brightest examples of living out these Jesuit ideals.
Adult LearnersStarting in 2015, Loyola will offer several FASTRACK degree programs for adult learners at its Cuneo Mansion & Gardens in Vernon Hills. Courses will be on alternating Saturdays with an online component—perfect for anyone looking to balance work, life, and school.
SustainabilityLoyola is ranked No. 4 on the Sierra Club’s 2014 list of the greenest colleges in America. The annual rankings are designed to spotlight universities that are deeply committed to environmental responsibility.
AcademicsLoyola is one of just 283 universities to have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, a claim that only about 10 percent of the nation’s colleges can make.
In the newsLoyola’s Information Commons joins an elite group of peers on Business Insider’s list of the “coolest” college libraries in the country.
ExploreThe Institute of Environmental Sustainability combines academics and research with agriculture and community living—all in one facility.
Damen CenterThe Damen Center was designed from top to bottom with students in mind, making it the center of social life on Loyola’s Lake Shore Campus.