Loyola University Chicago

- Navigation -

Loyola University Chicago

Dan K. Webb Center for Advocacy

School of Law

Why Take Dispute Resolution Classes?

Due to the increasing expense and delay involved in taking a case through full discovery (particularly with the advent of electronic discovery) and trial, dispute resolution processes such as negotiation, mediation and arbitration are increasingly being used to resolve legal disputes. In fact, many litigators in their early years of practice are more likely to represent a client at a mediation or arbitration than a trial. Moreover, even attorneys not involved in transactional negotiations will very likely engage in settlement negotiations.

A firm understanding of advocacy in these processes is now essential for attorneys in any practice area, and is expected by sophisticated clients. For example, a recent publication listed the following as some of the questions that clients should ask before retaining counsel to resolve a dispute:

As these questions make clear, attorneys now need to understand the various options for resolving a dispute and must be able not only to explain the advantages and risks of each process, but be able to advocate effectively for a client regardless of the dispute resolution mechanism selected. This means having a range of advocacy skills -- from knowing how to get an exhibit admitted into evidence at a trial to understanding how to deal with an opposing counsel engaging in positional bargaining at a mediation. At Loyola, our mission is to graduate well-prepared advocates who are able to assist their clients in achieving their goals in any dispute resolution setting.

1 Thomas Stipanowich, Curtis van Kann and Deborah Rothman, CCA Protocols for Expeditious, Cost-Effective Commercial Arbitration, (2010), p. 31.


Philip H. Corboy Law Center · 25 E. Pearson Street · Chicago, IL 60611 · 312.915.7120

Notice of Non-discriminatory Policy